Twenty years after the CRPD’s adoption, disability data still varies widely by source. At a COSP-19 side event organized by the Disability Data Initiative, Daniel Mont presented Washington Group tools for closing those gaps in disability data under Article 31.
Two surveys, same country, same questions; yet completely different disability prevalence estimates. A recent webinar unpacked why this happens, and why understanding the variation matters more than looking for a single "correct" number.
CIP explores how South Sudan used digital EMIS tools and the Washington Group Questions to identify over 41,000 students with disabilities, up from 6,000, and strengthen education planning.
What does a decade of disability policy work look like? The Center for Inclusive Policy (CIP) reflects on ten years as a disability policy organization, with insights from its team, board, and partners on turning evidence into action.